COVID HISTORICAL SUMMARY - 2-05-2022
I am going to introduce this essay, book outline and eminently important social message by using a modification of a much-used quote – it is best attributed to Hillel the Elder an important Jewish religious elder dating back to 100 BC. The gist of his message is:
If not us – then who?
If not now – then when?
I have been deeply concerned about what is going on with our country for the last two years.
At Thanksgiving, I began a debate with my brother about the COVID experience – vaccines, therapeutics, masks, and mandates. He is a doctor (internist) with a brilliant mind. He and I have always had wonderful debates about all aspects of parenting, diet, lifestyle, and medicine. What we learned at Thanksgiving is that we have lived through different experiences - throughout the entire pandemic. It is the first time in our lives that we had significant disagreements on an important topic. We have been looking at the same car wreck and came to different conclusions and interpretations. I have spent extensive effort researching all phases of the COVID experience – it can get very dark when you look at the implications of the poor decisions that have been made. Americans should never allow an important topic of health and safety to become political – it has resulted in a very unhealthy tribalism. These propaganda efforts will be discussed below.
My brother is very “Pro-Vax.” While I am not an “Anti-Vaxxer” – I am anti-COVID-vax especially in younger adults, pregnant women, and children. Vaccines that have been proven over a prolonged period (most have been studied for ten years before they were put on the children’s schedule) for seriously deadly diseases - I understand the risk/benefit profile. That fact set does not apply to these COVID vaccines. Most people I love and care about have been vaccinated. I have nothing but earnest hope that they will function as intended and protect the massive number of people who made the decision to take them. I know multiple doctors who have not seen any additional “vaccine injuries” at their hospitals. I hope these anecdotal observations turn out to be the norm. Humans have an enormous ability to respond and recover from injury. I am against how these novel COVID vaccines have been developed so quickly – without adequate and appropriate oversight. They cut corners in all aspects of the development and testing. The risks were not presented and then they mandated their administration in a “one-size-fits-all” manner. It is my opinion that these vaccines were not evaluated well enough to be put on the children’s schedule. I will discuss the implications of this decision below.
I also believe that COVID has revealed glaring weaknesses in our Government - Pharmaceutical oversight relationship. We have an obligation to our children and grandchildren to fix this glaring weakness, we are obliged to leave them a better country than we experienced. This great country has given everyone here a cornucopia of wonders and wealth. They deserve no less.
BACKGROUND TO THE PLAN
At the risk of being labeled a “tin-foil hat” crazy – I am going to put out a book outline that I admit is incredibly sad – and it might have certain holes in its theories. I absolutely know there are grains of truth throughout this – I may not have all my assumptions correct – but the themes all have precedents in history. I have crossed checked the facts with multiple sources to try to lessen any “misinformation.” The presented outcomes result in a massive amount of wealth being accumulated to those who were “in the know” to what occurred over the last two years. Most people hate conspiracy theories – I would agree. The last two years need to be thoroughly investigated. There were too many inconsistencies and bad policy decisions to be ignored. We can no longer assume that the people in control had our best interests in mind and were just incompetent. What follows should only be reserved for a Michael Crichton book. I designate my level of speculation after explaining each point.
The past two years were a test run.
Over the past 30 years, our government and health organizations have been performing “War Game Scenario Planning” for a pandemic. Go online and you will easily find them. The latest was in October 2019 (Event 201) at Johns Hopkins (another was the SPARS Pandemic Scenario Plan in 2017). The 2019 event discusses the possibilities of outcomes for our response to a pandemic that starts in China with a Coronavirus. The key players in attendance were Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) the research agency within our defense department, Large Internet companies (Google, Amazon, Apple), the Bill Gates Foundation, the NIH, and the CDC. Event 201 may have been the actual preplan test to ensure the plan was ready to be executed. The key point is that a large group of people have developed a plan on how to manage a pandemic. A substantial number of these people are well intentioned individuals and groups who have specific execution orders that they have been instructed to conduct in times of pandemic. The military components are instructed to obey orders that are clearly outlined in the planning documents. The internet companies have algorithms that drive the messaging and influence narratives that will ensure a “safe response” to control a pandemic.
Incentives to Test the Plan
During the scenario planning it became obvious that the internet moguls had an opportunity to generate enormous wealth in a brief time (without even placing large risky bets – all their companies would benefit tremendously in a world-wide shutdown of business). Also, never forget that large internet companies have agreements to cooperate with DARPA in times of emergency (DARPA developed the internet – people use it at their acquiescence). They will lose access to the internet if they do not follow DARPA instructions. People throughout history have been driven by incentives.
Our NIH and CDC funding budgets were built on the backbone of bioterrorism. Post 9/11, the NIH and NIAID budgets (which Anthony Fauci) controls went from $500 million to $42 billion. A significant percentage of this increased funding was directed at the threat of bioterrorism and vaccine development. The vaccines would be used to protect our soldiers and population from the bioterrorism. It was determined that our scientists needed to understand how viruses and other pathogens functioned to predict what weapons could be developed. This led to “gain of function” research – banned in 2014, reinstated in 2017. This understanding would allow for the better development of vaccines that could protect our populations. DARPA participated in all phases of the research. DARPA scientists are allowed to earn royalties related to their research. Moderna was built with DARPA funding. DARPA scientist could make significant royalty and stock gains from the technology they have developed.
Bill Gates has been investing in vaccines for years, he openly admits it is his best investment ever (20 time returns). Gates is the largest private funder of the WHO ($1 billion per year). Gates has been working with Fauci and the NIAID for over twenty years on all types of vaccines and technologies. Gates’s has developed an effective PR campaign that communicates that he is giving all his money away. Gates has understood the power and benefits that accrue to “The Richest Man in the World” – countries allow him to influence their healthcare decisions - for their entire populations. He has enormous influence – he wants to keep that influence.
The power of the NIAID and NIH funding cannot be understated. The $42 billion is the key to trillions of dollars in follow-up funding from other government entities, college research programs, professorships, PhD fellowships, international projects, and worldwide science trends. Having NIH funding is the start, it validates the project. If your application is rejected, your project is effectively over. Having this power concentrated in a small group of scientist and medical professionals in Washington is incredibly dangerous. It is how the NIH and CDC have been able to “capture” the conversation. No physician or researcher is willing to contradict the NIH messaging for fear of losing their funding. Loss of NIH funding would be career-ending for these professionals. This kind of power concentration in science – where debate and exchange of ideas IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD – is unacceptable.
DARPA along with the CIA have been developing propaganda mechanisms for one hundred years. They see the internet as the ultimate tool for propaganda – unprecedented in history. To have the control knob for messaging on a worldwide basis – provides them propaganda ability never seen in human history (I am probably exaggerating here – for dramatic effect)!
Below is an outline with multiple hypotheses as to the possible incentives and mechanisms that would/could be possible in an environment of an unknown virus. I discuss the key decisions made by our government officials and medical experts. I look at the key variables they studied to evaluate the situation. Did they choose the best path to save the most people possible? Did they weigh the cost/benefit of closing their societies and shut down our economic activity? I present it as a book outline because certain hypotheses are just too unbelievable to even consider that they could be possible in the US. The outline would easily be outstanding material for one of Michael Crichton’s best works. I do not have even a tiny percentage of Crichton’s writing skills. I apologize in advance. The plan in a summary (book outline):
THE OUTLINE – WHAT HAPPENED
1) Release a virus on the world. Make it look scarier than its actual virulence. Make sure it is not truly deadly to the world (we do not want to end the human species). Make sure it is close enough to natural evolution where denial of lab generation is possible. Having it originate in China – makes it impossible to investigate. Censor and de-platform any scientist who investigates the “lab-leak” hypothesis. (Fact check conclusion – this happened – almost all the world’s scientists believe that COVID was released from a lab. The only unknown is whether it was intentional or accident.) The cruise ship Diamond Princess (back in 2019) was an exceptionally good indicator that this coronavirus was not going to end the world and had a case fatality rate of around .02% - in the range of severe flu seasons. Interestingly, the Diamond Princess would be an “over-estimate” because the age stratification for this virus is unlike any we have ever encountered – the risk is concentrated in the elderly and obese [sadly, cruise ship participants trend toward both the elderly and obese (the buffets on cruise ships target this demographic)].
2) Control the early treatments that doctors are allowed to provide. Censor and de-platform any doctor who is providing or advising on early-treatment protocols. Make the early protocol to not allow antibiotics – bacterial pneumonia is deadly without antibiotics. Use PCR testing at 40 cycles to ensure every respiratory illness will “test” positive for COVID (flu, pneumonia, colds and COVID). The PCR test would later be modified to better target SARS – CoV-2, but 40 cycles will still generate a substantial number of false-positives. Make the virus look scary. Fund bad model simulations to show potential two million deaths from COVID in the US. (Fact check conclusion – all of this happened – the only issue is whether this was incompetence or intentional).
3) Over-report deaths related to the virus. Since every respiratory illness will “test” positive for COVID, this was not hard to achieve early in the process. Giving hospitals a higher reimbursement for COVID patients would lead to incentivizing that designation. (Fact check conclusion – this happened – Dr. Walensky has recently admitted to this over-reporting. Once again, intent is hard to evaluate).
4) Put “scare-porn” all over the internet. Even make it political to ensure that it inflames the public. Most who claim to vote Democrat believed (as late as October 2021) that they had a 50% chance of going to the hospital with COVID. Their real risk was less 2% - effectively 0% if under the age of fifty and healthy with no comorbidities – the divisive messaging worked. (Fact check – this was an actual poll; political views have resulted in different conclusions about COVID).
5) Direct certain officials to make moves that will result in more deaths (move sick people out of the hospital into nursing homes – done in New York and Michigan). (Fact check – this happened – intent is hard to determine – this needs to be investigated). As an interesting aside or strange coincidence – Both Cuomo and Michigan Gov. Whitmer had distraction operations to evade possible prosecution from these decisions. Whitmer had a false flag kidnapping attempt - planned by our FBI. Cuomo quickly resigned as Governor - after harassment charges. He had been in office for 10 years – and he just now started to harass women? Convenient timing? Additionally, his brother (CNN anchor) who helped exaggerate the fear porn, has recently resigned as well. On another interesting resignation the head of CNN (the media leader in scare-porn) has also recently resigned.
6) The cleverest idea they used was the ventilator shortage discussion. They used Governor Cuomo as their mouthpiece to put Trump on his backfoot with ventilators. It provided evidence that our medical community had a critical shortage of key medical equipment. The claim was that the country was short 500,000 ventilators. It provided the key issue and reason for “Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve.” “How do we triage our patients during a ventilator shortage?” Key players knew that if you could get the public to accept shutting down our country and economy (even for two weeks) – then it would accrue power to keep the fear porn going. This would play well with every neurotic-tendency personality and propaganda would be used to make it “patriotic” for non-neurotics to protect our healthcare workers. What was never discussed is the failure of ventilators. The technical talent needed to successfully keep a patient on a ventilator is scarce. You need to monitor oxygen saturation, pressure, and sedation (it is painful and uncomfortable to be put on one of these machines). There is tremendous risk of infection, aspiration, and lung damage from over pressurization. Anesthesiologists are critically important for people to successfully keep them comfortable without pushing them into complications from the over-application of anesthetic drugs. In the early phase of the pandemic there is evidence that patients were put on ventilators too soon to protect other patients and healthcare workers. Patients on ventilators do not cough and spread disease. It was quickly determined that ventilators should only be applied in extremely limited situations – which is why the “ventilator shortage” never materialized. Since this discussion tars everyone throughout (doctors, hospitals, politicians) this topic has never been highlighted and was able to slink off into the darkness without any key analysis for future pandemics. (Fact check – this happened – intent is hard to judge). In certain countries and blue states, we are in day 600+ of “two weeks to slow the spread.”
7) New York was key to making sure everyone was afraid of COVID. The Cuomo brothers talked about having to bury bodies in Central Park. Shortages of masks and PPE. Shortages of ventilators. The discussion consistently presented the worst-case scenario. (Fact check – this happened).
8) Ensure that we implement full pandemic shut down procedures. The shutdown was critical for the vaccine plan to be implemented. De-platform any scientists who wanted to discuss the trade-offs of shutting down the economy. The Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) was put out by thousands of scientists who believed that this virus did not warrant an economic shut-down. Fauci and Dr. Collins claimed these were fringe scientists – as clearly exposed in an email from Fauci to Collins. Nobel laureates were part of the GBD work – these scientists were hardly fringe. Sweden implemented the original WHO pandemic plan (GBD was based on this work) to not shut down the country. Sweden was attacked as a “killer country” with “no regard for the safety of its people.” Sweden now has among the best COVID statistics in Europe. (Fact check – this happened – Fauci and Collins must be investigated for this critical decision – it was the most impactful decision of our lifetime – it deserves a political neutral investigation – which probably makes it impossible to ever happen). A recent meta-analysis out of John’s Hopkins clearly shows that the “lock-downs” did nothing to reduce COVID transmission. Further confirming that this approach was not “following the science.” The devastation of these measures will take years to measure.
9) Make it seem that the only way out of the pandemic is through a “rescue” novel vaccine. (Fact check – this happened – Fauci’s messaging has never changed for this strategy of pandemic response – he sold vaccines from the start).
10) Get the world’s population to take a novel vaccine that includes nanotechnology. Since the original virus is not really that deadly, the vaccines do not even need to work. Game the system where needed to make it appear that the vaccines work. This was achieved through the clever way of claiming that two weeks post vaccination – everyone is still considered “unvaccinated.” It is outlined in “Bayesian Data Crime – Bad Cattitude” on substack (look it up – it is very clever)! In summary, the vaccines are inflammatory (from the adjuvants, nanoparticles, and mRNA). This inflammatory response causes an increase in hospitalizations and death. By making these outcomes attributable to the “unvaccinated” people (two weeks post vaccination people are still reported as “unvaccinated”), the more you administer the vaccine, the better the comparison looks for statistical purposes. If these poor outcomes were attributable to the vaccine (which caused the inflammation problem) – the comparison would put the vaccines into serious question. A shockingly simple “data crime” that has been completely ignored by our government. (Fact check – this happened – it is extremely hard to determine intent – if you doubt this discussion – I would implore you to visit Bad Cattitude on Substack) the link:( https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/bayesian-datacrime-defining-vaccine).
11) Nanotechnology is the platform which DARPA has been using to target “upgrade” of our soldiers. I will not go down the path of all things possible with nanotechnology – you can investigate that on your own. One document to look up is “Human Augmentation – The Dawn of a New Paradigm” published by the UK Ministry of Defense and the German Federal Ministry of Defense in 2019. The possibilities for nanotechnology in humans are enormous – linking machine function to human brains. (Fact check – this is all speculation – I really do not want to go here).
12) Spread propaganda to ensure vaccines are considered “safe and effective.” Label anyone an “Anti-Vaxxer” who discusses anything related to vaccine effectiveness or danger. Repeat the slogan “This is a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated”! The most interesting part of this slogan has a grain of truth. The average COVID casualty is eighty-four years old with four comorbidities. The typical eighty-four-year-old person with four comorbidities will not manage these vaccines well (see the inflammation discussion above) – most doctors would recommend against vaccination for this group. They are the people who are filling up the ICU beds (eighty-four years old with four comorbidities) – they are unvaccinated. Scientific honest estimates, indicate that over 92% of the US population has been infected with COVID or has been vaccinated (we are probably higher now that Omicron has been circulating for months). A tiny group of people remain unvaccinated or uninfected. Most anti-vaxxers at this point are the naturally infected, who have strong immunity from COVID. This group has strong reasons to remain unvaccinated. There is no study that justifies that the naturally recovered (naturally immune) need to get vaccinated. If the vaccines were sterilizing (as promised), we would easily be at herd immunity. (Fact check – this happened – intent is hard to determine).
13) Ensure to get the vaccines on the children’s schedule. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act would excuse the Pharma companies from liability if on the schedule for children. The FDA’s advisory committee Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) originally voted against vaccinations for children (15 against, one for). The FDA chose to bypass its VRBPAC advisory committee and approved the vaccines on November 17, 2021. With no record of death from COVID for any healthy child anywhere in the world – there is no evidence to indicate that these vaccines provide any protection for children. This was unprecedented by the FDA leadership! Members of VRBPAC resigned because of this unprecedented decision by the government leaders of the FDA. Germany, France, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, and Finland have halted administration of Moderna’s vaccine for males under thirty because of concerns with a high rate of myocarditis. We have heard crickets from our government authorities regarding this risk. Additionally, where is the study that investigates why this is limited to young males? Is there a genetic or development tendency that would keep this risk from expanding to the overall population over time? Are young males the canary in the coal mine? Are we to believe that this is a “male only” issue and somehow magically disappears when males turn thirty-one? How was the “thirty” age limit determined? Getting an experimental vaccine on the kid’s schedule - without any major risk from the disease they are being vaccinated for - should terrify any thinking parent on the planet. (Fact check – this all happened – this is the key fact that drove me to perform the deep-dive investigation).
14) Evaluate your internet propaganda routines. Modify them when necessary. At no time in my 65 years of life have I seen the censoring and information manipulation over the past two years. It has been shocking to see the consistent parroting of “talking points” worldwide. The latest example (I could author a book alone on this topic) is the attempts to censor the Joe Rogan podcast. This may be the most frightening part of experiencing the past two years. I would ask the question – “When in human history has the organizations pushing for censorship been proven to be on the correct side of the issue?” The examples that come to mind for me are Nazi Germany, Stalin Russia, and Mao China – the censors were not the heroes in these situations. (Fact check – censoring attempts are continuing in the US – this is unacceptable for a scientific discussion).
15) Evaluate which populations will comply. Evaluate which populations will become a problem. Use typical scapegoating techniques to label the non-compliant groups. (Fact check – this has sadly happened throughout the two years – both sides have been miserable failures).
16) Evaluate all phases of the pandemic scenario plans when it is determined which country populations will be compliant. Australia even implemented “pandemic camps” to lock up citizens in a supposedly “free” country – something they thought was at the edge of possibilities in the scenario planning. I truly never thought I would see this in my lifetime in a free country like Australia. There is something very wrong with this. (Fact check – this happened).
17) Evaluate the possibility of vaccine passports and digital registration. This opens the door to a social credit system which has been implemented in China. Multiple countries attempted this roll out with varying amounts of success (Canada has put travel restrictions on unvaccinated people and required digital vaccine passports). There is a fifty-mile truck convoy in Ottawa which is the official residence of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The truckers intend to shut down trucking operations in Canada until Trudeau removes the electronic vaccine passport system. If you have not heard about this protest – you are listening to the wrong news sources. Go Truckers! This response gives me hope that we are not doomed! (Fact check – this trucking happened!)
18) Release the much less virulent version of the virus (Omicron) as planned after all the procedures are evaluated and declare the pandemic over. Omicron overwhelms the other variants and effectively ends the pandemic – as planned. (Fact check – this is speculation on my part – however, there is something strange about the genetic progression of Omicron – once again this needs full investigation – Omicron may be a “normal” variant from the original man-made virus).
19) Have the key players retire or leave their positions to not allow investigation. Francis Collins is retiring from the head of the NIH this year (already announced). Fauci is eighty-one, he will announce his retirement soon. DARPA is immune from investigation. The internet companies all used algorithms to censor as directed from DARPA, the NIH, and the CDC. They will claim that they were just performing as instructed from our government agencies. They have paid government officials significant sums – the internet and media companies will not even be investigated. The worldwide government officials will claim that they were only implementing the pandemic plan as outlined in the scenario planning. The CDC and the NIH will confuse the public in participating countries about approaches by non-participating countries (India, South America, and others used Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine with greater success than the participating countries which relied on vaccines). They will then slink out of town with their trillions. (Fact check – this is speculation).
20) There were two real “unknowns” to this plan.
a) Will the virus behave as expected? They have been working with Coronaviruses for 30 years now (Dr. Baric at North Carolina is one of our leading experts and published his first paper in this area in the early 1990’s – he cloned SARS coronaviruses in 2003). They have significant knowledge regarding how these viruses work and the key issues that will make them dangerous. The unintended consequences of releasing a virus that has not gone through the natural steps of evolution is unmeasurable. Viruses always mutate – there is no way to accurately predict how it will evolve in the future. They have been on the planet for 1.5 billion years. This area of research is incredibly dangerous, requiring enormous egos. It is why the Obama administration banned “gain-of-function” research. I fully agree with this ban.
b) Will the novel vaccines be safe? Since the virus is not actually that dangerous, the vaccines just need to not kill people. There is evidence that 5% of the vaccine batches cause all the complications and deaths. There is a website with extensive analysis of the batches and then they interface the information with the VAERS adverse events. The website is
https://www.howbadismybatch.com/
. For this website to be completely manufactured – it would require an enormous amount of effort and information. If this information has validity, there are multiple explanations for how this could happen. I will present five hypotheses that would seem to fit. The vaccine manufacturers have not disclosed the necessary information to evaluate real data and events – we are left to speculate:
Hypothesis One.
They knew there were risks to the vaccines and only put the “real mRNA” content in the lipid nanoparticles in a small percentage of the population. The adjuvants and nanoparticles would provide an inflammation response (your arm would be sore, and you would feel tired/sick) whether you received mRNA or not. Remember, the original vaccine outline indicated that the mRNA would isolate in the arm and then your body would degrade the mRNA (since they were so delicate - stored at minus one hundred degrees). It allowed for the possibility that there would be no evidence that anyone ever received mRNA in a vaccine. I am hopeful that my speculation on not having mRNA in all the vaccines is correct – this would have me less worried about long-term unexpected issues caused by the experimental “science.”
Hypothesis Two.
The most novel piece of the technology is the lipid nanoparticle and its related manufacture. If the lipid nanoparticle does not completely incapsulate the mRNA, it would allow for the extensive inflammatory responses seen in early animal studies related to direct injection of mRNA. This is somewhat comforting, because this type of vaccine malfunction would cause a prompt response – probably within the first two weeks. This should give comfort to those who were vaccinated months ago without incident.
Hypothesis Three.
The manufacturers had targeted levels of mRNA for each nanoparticle. There is evidence that the Moderna vaccine has caused more vaccine incidents because they carry a much larger payload of mRNA than the Pfizer vaccine. It would then be possible that the issues arise from vaccines that deliver more than expected mRNA in the dose.
Hypothesis Four.
The drug manufacturers had to ramp up production of both the mRNA and the Lipid Nanoparticle. This level of production was like none ever seen in human history. Since these novel vaccines had never been made on small scale – much less - the entire world’s population – ramp up would make it possible for multiple manufacturing process failures. Do not undersell the difficulty of manufacturing at this scale and under this type of tight tolerances and parameters.
Hypothesis Five.
The vaccines require refrigeration to ranges of minus one hundred degrees F. With a roll out of billion doses, it is hard to imagine that certain doses were exposed to higher temperatures. It is unknown what risks develop when these vaccines are exposed to temperature.
At the end of this section of the outline – you must ask yourself – did this happen? In almost every part of the outline – it happened. The only questions that remain are whether these events were intentional, error, or a combination of these.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1) It remains a possibility that the original release was an accident. This is easily possible. Accidental releases have occurred before. This would require that Dr. Baric and others evaluate the virus’s virulence to determine whether real pandemic plans needed to be released or whether the scenario above could be implemented. With a thirty-year knowledge base, this would not have taken long to evaluate. Additionally, since it was “man-made” they could easily look at every component used to modify the virus. Given the “OK” from Dr. Baric’s team, they would then implement the scenario as outlined above. The team would then go about developing the Omicron strain to end the pandemic (took two years). (Fact check – total speculation on my part)
2) It is also possible that this was deliberately released by operatives in China. If that is the case – the over-reaction from our health officials early in the pandemic may have been warranted. Never changing their approaches after the virus and illness was evaluated is still of critical concern for all Americans. (Fact check – total speculation).
3) How could the vaccines be developed so soon? Gates made an investment of $100 million in Moderna during 2016 and 2018 (worth $5 billion at top stock price in August 2021). Everyone has been excited about the mRNA technology for decades. There are detailed discussions all over the internet about the twenty-year history of failure with the mRNA vaccine concept. It would take a great leap of faith to believe these failures could be “fixed” in the limited time available for them to be effective for this pandemic. Once again, they did not have to work. Moderna’s market cap went from $5 billion in 2019 to $180 billion at the peak of 2021. DARPA is a large investor in Moderna, and its scientists make royalties off Moderna technology. The concept of mRNA is exciting for cancer treatment and other diseases – it would be easy to elicit excitement from the medical community about the technology. In a scary tinfoil hat a scientist used the US Government’s Basic Logical Alignment Search Tool (BLAST – it is the database for DNA information on all viruses and bacteria - worldwide) to investigate the components of the virus that were “unusual.” He concluded that SARS-CoV-2 was a bat coronavirus that had been modified with pieces of the HIV virus and two uniquely “man-made” components which had a patent from 2012 to 2017 (applied and finalized). The patent holder for the uniquely man-made component is Moderna. Hard to make this stuff up! (I must admit I do not have the technical skillset to evaluate this one – I had a friend PhD who confirmed that his analysis agrees that the BLAST analysis and convinces him that the virus is man-made). (Fact checks – mostly facts here).
4) Are people really this evil? This is the harder question. The average age of COVID deaths is eighty-four. Let that sink in. It would be easy to rationalize that this would affect only the unhealthy that were going to die anyway (later in the year). They were just labeling other deaths as COVID deaths. See Ethiopia discussion below. Initially instructing doctors to not use antibiotics for bacterial pneumonia seems suspect. Once again – elderly people mostly affected. (Fact check – total speculation). People risk their life to rob banks – keep in mind they were looking at generational wealth – never possible in human history. The estimate is that the top ten wealthiest men in the US – most participated in the scenario planning (Bezos, Zuckerberg, Gates, and Page) increased their wealth by over $540 Billion in the first 10 months of the pandemic. I believe that this size pay-off qualifies as incentive.
5) Trump. Sadly, this needs to be discussed. Every constituency in this scenario was at risk from Trump. He was never supposed to be there. He was not controllable. The military complex did not like his rhetoric about stopping “endless wars.” He kept us out of Syria. He appointed people willing to fire people in the government. He discussed “fake news.” He discussed breaking-up the internet mogul’s companies. He was trouble for everyone involved. The unexpected success of his first term, led to the possibility of four more years. Anything that would prevent him from re-election was on the table. Fauci’s obvious contempt could have caused him alone to push the “pandemic button.” (Fact check – total speculation – the Trump years will be impossible to discuss with our grandchildren – no one will ever understand them – most would not even believe it really happened).
6) Peter Daszak. Any discussion of this is incomplete without mentioning this person of interest. He is on video discussing how to specifically modify coronaviruses. His group received funding from our NIH for gain of function research in Wuhan. It is obvious that his team was doing the work that could result in SARS-CoV-2. His videos are undeniable proof. Dr Baric may be innocent, hard to determine. (Fact check – all true).
PROBLEMS CAUSED BY US GOVERNMENT APPROACH:
There are events during the past two years that led me down this dark path to even create the book outline:
1) Early on, health professionals and longevity enthusiasts saw this as an opportunity to promote metabolic health. Change diets. Get out in the sun. Exercise. These all were effective against COVID. Our government officials were silent in this area. The longevity experts that I follow were censored and de-platformed for mentioning that Vitamin D would be helpful to prevent bad outcomes from COVID. Vitamin D would be healthy for people even if it did not help with COVID. This was a huge red flag that something was wrong in our system.
2) Hydroxychloroquine was attacked by our government officials early on. Especially after Trump mentioned its use. It was FDA approved in 1955. It has been used for malaria and treatment for autoimmune disease for 60 years. It is incredibly safe. In 2019, it was prescribed 5.4 million times in the US! Our government funded a study in our Veteran community where Hydroxychloroquine was given to patients in late-stage disease of COVID and on ventilators. It was a study designed to fail. This was an obvious deception by our government. I would love to say this is total speculation on my part – but doctors should have been allowed to use this to prove whether it worked or not. Something was very wrong in this approach.
3) Ivermectin was labeled “horse de-wormer.” This is one of the most prescribed drugs in history. It won a Nobel Prize for Sotashi Omura and William Campbell. The efforts to eliminate the drug from the US market was obvious. Threatening US doctors by taking their license was an over-reach and obvious effort that was contrary to supporting patient health. The Attorney General of Nebraska issued a statement defending the use of Ivermectin and made it illegal to threaten doctors with loss of license. The AG also defended the used of Hydroxychloroquine! Crickets from our government officials and the press on this sends out huge red flags.
4) Fluvoxamine (an old anti-depressant known for its inflammation inhibition – especially in the brain – it has been used for over 25 years) has gone through phase 2 and phase 3 random controlled trials for the treatment of COVID. The outcomes were unquestionably strong. The FDA did not approve it for use and finally only recently issued a “neutral” claim on its effectiveness. Johns Hopkins has Fluvoxamine on its therapy protocol for COVID. Dr. Fauci has never mentioned its use in the thousands of interviews that he has given in the last year. Pharmacies have refused to fill the prescription if it does not state that the reason for its use is for depression.
5) Any effective therapeutic drug would disallow the Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines. The efforts to discredit effective therapies is a potential effort to keep the vaccines in play. The playbook discussed in Event 201 details the efforts needed to attack vaccine hesitancy.
6) Ethiopia and Kenya – a statistical impossibility – in every way
The key to the entire narrative was to make this virus appear as dangerous as possible. If the Ethiopia numbers were ever published, the concerns and implications would be staggering (Kenya’s numbers are similar). Ethiopia has a population of about $119 million (about one-third of the US population). I will “population adjust” the Ethiopian results for the following table – and then discuss the possible reasons for the difference in numbers. As you will see – I cannot find a good reason that could possibly explain the massive differences – we cannot be looking at the same disease – or the information from one source (likely the US information) has been “doctored.” Ethiopia had their first COVID cases in March of 2020 – so they have been dealing with the virus for a similar length of time. They had fewer “lockdowns” with little compliance. They never had a hospital shortage or surge.
Ethiopia Statistics (and comparative US statistics) both as of 9/2021
(Covid deaths in Ethiopia – 5,400 - have been multiplied by 2.77 to equate populations)
Vaccinated % Deaths Average Age % Obese adults
Ethiopia 1% 15,000 19 ~0%
United States 70% 700,000 38 68%
The possible explanations for these differences are outlined below:
a) Ethiopia does not have a large population of eight-four-year-old people with four co-morbidities. This is the most likely difference.
b) Obesity is the largest driver of risk from COVID. This is a likely contributor.
c) The US numbers represent a massive over-reporting of deaths attributable to COVID. Even Dr. Walensky from the CDC agrees with this assessment.
d) Massive under-reporting of COVID deaths by Ethiopia. This is a small possibility – there are incentives to receive COVID related funding worldwide.
e) Vaccinations are killing people in the US. I am not even going to go there.
f) Ethiopians have super-human powers to fight off COVID. Total speculation on my part!
Other possible differences that could explain the differences would be population density, exercise, lifestyle, and sun exposure. This points to a massive disparity. If the US had 15,000 deaths over two years, we would never have heard of this disease or never even named the disease COVID.
Can you imagine if these honest statistics were used to shape the narrative? If you are over eighty-four and have four co-morbidities this disease is serious. If you are young and obese, this disease may be serious. If you are neither – this disease is not likely serious. We just might have had a different approach to this “pandemic.”
7) The drug trials on the vaccines were very weak. They were stopped well ahead of the three-year plan (six months) and the control group was vaccinated (eliminating the control group should not have been allowed by our government). A large group of participants were eliminated from the study within the first two weeks. They provided no discussion of the reason for the dropouts or whether the dropouts were from the control group or from the vaccinated. Pfizer submitted its initial response from a freedom of information request filed last year. Pfizer requested a seventy-five-year timeline to finish the disclosures related to the detailed study procedures (they wanted until 2096 to finish disclosure). The DOJ lawyers representing the FDA have asked the federal judge if they can use Pfizer’s assistance in redacting the documents before release! No conflict of interest there!! The results were marginal at best – especially when reviewed by experienced drug trial veterans. The other key factor accelerating the roll-out of the vaccines is the natural seasonality waves that have been observed by this and other respiratory viruses. By rolling them out in January and February, the vaccines could take credit for the expected seasonal downturn in cases and hospitalizations.
8) Just a reminder that these Pharma companies are not always careful and paying fines is the “cost” of operations. Just a small walk down memory lane for a reminder (from “Bad Pharma”):
Pfizer fined $2.3 Billion in 2009
GSK fined $3.1 Billion in 2012
Abbot fined $1.5 Billion in 2012
Eli Lilly fined $1.4 Billion in 2009
Merck fined $1.0 Billion in 2011
J&J fined $2.2 Billion in 2013
I could go on – but you get the point.
The Pharma lobby is the highest paying lobby in Washington – paying $4.5 Billion over the last two decades.
Pharma is the least trusted large organization in the US – barely nudging out our federal government and the healthcare industry.
9) Long-term side effects of “leaky vaccines.” Not to pile on and provide more concern about vaccine safety – but since the vaccines are obviously “leaky” (meaning they do not provide sterilizing prevention from contracting the disease) – we must begin to investigate whether we have an obvious effect that should lead us to change paths and respond accordingly. These possible outcomes would require full chapters of medical book text to fully explain the potential implications of the leaky vaccines we are observing. I will only provide a brief discussion here.
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
This happens when the vaccine you received does not match well to the virus you encounter (because of variants). If you then are exposed to the non-matching virus, you may have a worse case than you would have had otherwise. This could explain why vaccinated people can readily contract Omicron and have had difficulty recovering from the milder virus (the vaccine may have been too narrowly focused). ADE is common in virus vaccines because viruses mutate so quickly.
Original Antigenic Sin
This is the strangely named situation when your immune response uses its “memory” of response to the original pathogen it encounters. A ninety-year-old person encountering the flu may rely on its “memory” of the first flu that they encountered long ago. If the flu virus is similar enough to the original exposure – then the immune response will be adequate. If the flu is significantly variant – then the response would be inadequate. The vaccine elicits a response to the spike protein – it is the original “imprint” used by our immune system. It may not be adequate to get an appropriate full immunity from all variants of these corona viruses currently spreading worldwide.
Marek’s Disease Phenomenon
This possibility is the scariest – because we have seen it happen in chicken vaccines. In that instance, the chicken vaccines allow the virus to become a much more virulent in the vaccinated chickens. The unvaccinated chickens had to be wary of the vaccinated. Hopefully, our healthcare team is monitoring our leaky COVID vaccines to ensure this situation does not develop in the future.
10) One year after the start of the vaccine rollouts, we still do not have statistics on which vaccines are most effective and stratified by age groups. This lack of transparency is unacceptable.
11) VAERS stands for (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Through one year, our VAERS system is reporting more adverse events and deaths from COVID vaccines than all other vaccines for the last thirty years - combined! This is a vaccine schedule that includes seventy vaccines. Every other vaccine would have been stopped from these reported events. Historically, VAERS is under-reported by over 95%. Currently, the total deaths on VAERS are over 22,600 and the adverse events are over 1.1 million. Multiply these numbers by the typical VAERS under-reporting (40X) and they could be considered dangerous. During testimony at a hearing held by Senator Ron Johnson, Ohio attorney Thomas Renz presented testimony that confirms the under-reporting on VAERS. Renz represents members of military who are suing against the vaccine mandates for the military. Renz presented data given to him by three military doctors. They summarized data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). Unlike the VAERS system, which is voluntary, the DMED is mandatory to ensure the readiness of our armed services. The info presented by Renz (under penalty of perjury due to senate testimony) showed the following increases over the five year average for the following medical codes:
Increase 5-year avg. 2021 cases
Miscarriages were up 300% 1,499 4,182
Cancer diagnosis 300% 38,700 114,645
Neurological issues 1,000% 82,000 863,000
Myocardial infarction 269%
Bell’s palsy 291%
Congenital malformations 156%
Female infertility 471%
Pulmonary embolisms 467%
There are several possible conclusions that can be drawn from these data. Possible conclusion 1) attorney Renz perjured himself in the hearing; possible conclusion 2) the three military doctors provided inaccurate information under penalty of perjury; possible conclusion 3) the military received a higher percentage of mRNA included vaccines than the general population; possible conclusion 4) these increases are unrelated to the vaccines and our military has some other sudden reason for a dramatic deterioration in health; possible conclusion 5) according to Politifacts, their government insider contacts indicate – the numbers in the DMED system for the five years prior to 2021 were all wrong and understated (this is their response) or possible conclusion 6) the information confirms that the VAERS system is grossly unreported consistent with the historical trends over the last 40 years. Once again, I point to the anecdotal evidence from my doctor acquaintances – they are not seeing or hearing about anything close to the numbers that this analysis might imply. We need better information from our government and pharmaceutical community regarding vaccine safety. The VAERS system has been broken for a long time. It is possible to fix this. We must fix this going forward.
12) Reporting conundrum. Since the COVID vaccines are “experimental,” life insurance companies are refusing to pay on vaccine death life insurance claims. A doctor knowing this will hesitate to write down the cause of death as the vaccine – knowing that the family will be left without a claim. This risk could be the cause of significant under-reporting. How can we put people in that bind!
13) The hospitals were incentivized to over-report COVID deaths. Their reimbursements were much higher for COVID deaths.
14) At least six major non-US countries (France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark) have banned the Moderna vaccine for males under thirty. Our government is silent. How can our government have a completely different knowledge base than these six countries (there are other additional smaller countries that have pulled recommendations for these vaccines)? Our government did not even issue a strong warning or present evidence that contradicts the conclusions from these countries. How can this be?
15) We have received no guidance on boosting strategies among the different vaccines. Once again, science would give you a strategy based on studies (we have a $42 billion dollar budget). Instead, we have a suggestion to use any of them in combination with any other – man that really sounds scientific – but “what the hell” do I know.
16) There is a two-week window following the second vaccine injection where the immune system is under stress and the patients are much more susceptible to infection from COVID or other viruses and infections. No public discussion has been made of this. For reporting, the two-week period following vaccination is still considered “unvaccinated” for reporting of illness or death. This is “Pharmaceutical Gaming.”
17) Ignoring natural immunity by any US government official. Every other coronavirus has shown natural immunity is strong for prevention of re-infection from coronaviruses – yet our government tells us that “we don’t know” about this virus – still after two years (I go back to the $42 billion dollar budget and trillions being spent because of this disease). Even the two extremely weak studies by the CDC which were obviously “cherry-picked” or “Phished” to bring natural immunity into question (versus vaccine immunity). Mandating a leaky vaccine for naturally immune people is not following the science – it is ignoring the science. These clearly showed our government’s intent to confuse and promote vaccines.
18) Ignoring the science with mandates. I must bring up Aaron Rodgers and Novak Djokovic. There are few humans on our planet who have less risk of complications from COVID than these two athletes. They both have had COVID, they fully recovered without complications. Ignoring the science and requiring them to get vaccinated and vilifying them is unconscionable. Affecting Djokovic’s ability to play his sport is a crime. Requiring young healthy college students to get a booster is a crime. These include healthy young men, who have had COVID, and who have been double vaccinated! They have a statically zero risk of having a problem with COVID! This requirement is completely ignoring the science. The message from the Healthcare Authorities is “You are Stupid – Don’t ask Questions – Just do It – Take the Jab!”
19) Herd immunity. When the first discussion of the concept of herd immunity, Dr. Fauci indicated that 60-70% of the adult population would probably provide the herd immunity to stop the pandemic. As time has passed this number has migrated upward. President Biden has indicated that “98% of Americans need to be vaccinated.” No science backs up this statement.
20) Omicron is a much milder version of the virus (obvious from the information from South Africa). Yet we used it for more scare-porn to shut down schools. This is completely different than what the evidence provides. Omicron should have led a true group of scientists to pivot and give us an open discussion and analysis of the data. The conclusion was already derived before the analysis. The White House even issued a statement that Omicron would result in “a winter of pain and death for the unvaccinated.” What an extreme exaggeration – once again losing confidence from me.
21) The theory was that the mRNA material would isolate in the muscle of the arm and then be degraded. The actual results indicate that the mRNA travels throughout the body for up to 15 months. It accumulates in multiple places (spleen, ovaries, bone marrow, and other areas) where it could do damage and cause problems. When the results do not match up with the theory, a pause is worth considering. No discussion of any of this from our government authorities.
22) The Gundry heart study published with the American Heart Association showed a significant deterioration in heart health for his vaccinated patients. This is a signal that needs to be investigated. The lipid nanoparticles are inflammatory - whether they have mRNA in them or not. Once again – crickets from the US health authorities.
23) This point is embarrassing to write as a US citizen. It is so obvious and points to the corruption of our government – I cannot believe that it has never been publicized anywhere. You can find out what is important to a person by watching where they spend their money. The NIAH has funded multiple studies related to the COVID pandemic over the past two years. The latest tally is as follows (according to Dr. Marty Makary – MD with a Master’s degree in Public Health) at Johns Hopkins:
NIH COVID-related Funding:
254 Funded studies – Social and Health Disparities from COVID
1 Funded study – Immunity provided by natural infection
4 Funded studies – How the SARS-CoV-2 virus spreads
1 Funded study – Effectiveness of masks related to the spread of SARS-CoV-2
If this does not show the misplaced priorities of our bureaucratic officials – nothing else could. This is a “microphone-drop” moment!
24) Robert Kennedy Jr. authored an amazing book implicating Fauci, Gates about the government’s role in health and specifically vaccines. It is the “Number One Best Seller” in the US without a marketing budget or promotion from the book sellers or publishers. It is stunning if 10% of it is true. I would hope that it is not true; I would bet all my money that there is significant truth throughout the book. The last chapter is required reading for every US citizen. Robert Kennedy is an active litigating lawyer with billion-dollar judgements currently in our court system. Any obvious lies or misinformation would be used against him in court to invalidate his credibility. His book is extremely well referenced because of this risk.
MEDICAL ETHICS, GENE MODIFICATION, HUMAN TRIALS, AND FULL DISCLOSURE IN MEDICINE
Background for human trials with small population diseases
Having been a cancer patient (with a serious prognosis); I have investigated an extensive amount of drug trials and therapies for potential cancer cures for the past 15 years. One of the methods that the drug development companies use is to find small populations with highly deadly cancers to focus on drug development. The first question that comes to mind is “why would they target small populations with serious disease with short life expectancies – this would seem like the wrong group to target?” Drug companies usually want drugs and therapies that can be applied to the largest segments of the population. The unstated reason for these drug development efforts is to try new novel delivery methods or approaches. If a terminal cancer patient with extremely short life expectancy is offered an experimental drug, they are much more likely to try the drug – they have little to lose. If the treatment does not work, you have little remorse for damaging someone’s health with a six-month prognosis.
Small population studies and the relation to these novel vaccines
The COVID vaccines are all using a new novel technology using lipid nanoparticles. The mRNA technology which is the basis for these novel vaccines has been in development for decades. The hard part of the technology has been the delivery method. The animal studies have shown consistently that mRNA causes a strong negative response when directly injected or administered without proper “packaging.” The breakthrough came with the development of the “novel lipid nanoparticle.” It allows the mRNA to be packaged in the nanoparticle and then be injected into cells and deliver their payload without the typical negative host response. When asked about human trials and precedence for these nanoparticle delivery mechanisms, the vaccine developers refer to approvals for “several other therapies.” I found two drugs that went through Phase III trials, using novel lipid nanoparticles. The two drugs which acknowledge using lipid nanoparticles were Rivusiron and Patisiron. Rivusiron’s Phase III trial was discontinued after multiple patients in the treatment group died. Patisiron successfully completed its Phase III trial in 2018. Both drugs target treatment of ATTR amyloidosis and cardiomyopathy (ATTRA&C), a disease that affects about 10,000 patients worldwide. ATTRA&C patients have an extremely short life expectancy. The only current therapy for these patients is liver transplant – which itself has an extremely poor long-term prognosis. This would be an ideal test group to investigate with a novel delivery system. The “successful” mRNA randomized control trial was done using 225 patients. The projected cost of the new therapy advertised by the drug companies was between $250,000 - $450,000 per year. This cost would assuredly limit the population of any control group taking this drug over the long term – additionally, the population is subject to a significantly large list of maladies that normally occur over time with patients who have ATTRA&C. Interestingly, when you look through the side-effects of the delivered mRNA nanoparticle drug, Patisiron is linked to significant inflammation shortly after dosing. This inflammatory response is remarkably like the documented patient response from the COVID vaccines. The package insert for Patisiron recommends administering steroids, acetaminophen, and antihistamines prior to dosing. The other serious side-affect listed for Patisiron was upper-respiratory infections. A similar profile from the COVID mRNA nanoparticle vaccines would make them rather risky to be administered during an upper-respiratory pandemic. This is useful information for everyone in evaluating Nanoparticle Vaccines.
Interesting messaging from the scientists who developed Patisiron – “Genetics”
A consistent message from the medical community involves “these mRNA vaccines do not change your DNA.” Additionally, the early discussion was that the mRNA vaccines would isolate in your arm muscle and be degraded by the body. When investigating the mRNA approach used in developing Patisiron, the messaging they use is not so limited. The development scientist openly discusses the potential of the technology. Quotes include: “In essence, we can turn off any gene we want” and “the Nanoparticles usually end up in the organs which have a high volume of blood flow – the liver, spleen, bone marrow, kidney, and heart.”
Warnings and Monitoring of VAERS
The early warning system in place for vaccines is VAERS. It is voluntary. It is difficult and time consuming to fill out all the forms related to making a filing. Historically, every analysis has shown that it results in considerable under-reporting. Dr. Fauci and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky testified before the senate on January 12, 2022 – a full year after the initial vaccines were administered. They were both queried about the number of adverse events and deaths related to COVID vaccines. Both gave the same answers “The VAERS system is mandatory and easy to over-report. If someone is hit by a car soon after receiving a COVID vaccine – this is counted as a death.” When asked about what numbers are currently reported in the VAERS system. Both said they did not know the numbers but would get back to the senators later. Two of our top health officials are testifying before the senate regarding vaccines and the most important numbers to be evaluated are unavailable for discussion. This response cannot be explained by incompetence. It would be like a CEO showing up at an earnings release conference and not knowing the earnings of his corporation – he would be fired within hours.
WHY WOULD YOU EVEN PAY ATTENTION TO ME WHEN IT COMES TO A HEALTH QUESTION OF GOVERNMENT RECOMMENDATION?
I am not sure I have a great answer for you. I do not have a medical degree. I do not even have a solid formal biological science background. I would only point out that I am particularly good at spotting patterns. Since my cancer diagnosis in 2005, I did not work full time for ten years. My passion was to investigate what made me ill and what approaches I could take to extend my longevity and try to keep the cancer from coming back. My prognosis was poor (this is an understatement). If I had only had throat cancer (I had two other cancers), I would have had a 75% chance of not watching my son David graduate from high school (he is now 24).
Part of my investigation involved reading nutritional studies and drug studies. When the indicators are being presented as going only one way – red flags should always emerge. When you hear messaging from multiple sources that is inconsistent, red flags should go up. You find that the drug companies have become tremendous at getting drugs approved and manipulating data. Sometimes the manipulation is so subtle; it takes a genius to spot the crime. Non-conspicuous details: like who is in the trial; who drops out of the trial early; do they manipulate the control group; do they drop out time periods from when the drug is applied; what gets classified as an event. Absolute risk versus relative risk manipulation is even more diabolical. One of the consistent trial manipulations is to stop a trial before the planned end point after they believe that the data has enough positive spin to present (done with the COVID vaccines) – right out of the Big Pharma playbook.
I do not expect you to believe this. I am not sure I am ready to believe this. It has been spinning around in my head for the last two years and has most recently codified to be written here. I plan to distribute this information or guestimate – whatever it is – on multiple substack outlets. I am not kidding when I tell you – I am happy and have no intention of killing myself anytime soon.
Michael Crichton
(Used here to acknowledge his brilliance and to show how unbelievable this must sound)
I must admit that a small portion of this messaging is speculation on my part. It is difficult to believe that a small group of people could pull this off without a whistleblower showing up. Project Veritas has disclosed a government DARPA memo that confirms that this was a lab leak and that they knew that therapeutics were available to stop the virus. Senator Johnson has requested further information regarding the Project Veritas disclosure and has requested an interview with Major Joseph Murphy (the memo source). No additional news is available at this date. This could be real – or it could be someone just as crazy as I am.
SOCIAL ACTION MESSAGES
1) Vaccine remorse. If you are reading this and have been vaccinated – do not be put off. You are in the overwhelming majority. Most people have done very well with them. Most vaccine issues are prevalent in people who have a problem with COVID. If you did not react shortly after the second dose you should respond well going forward. Hell, if my crazy book speculation outline is correct, you did not even get mRNA in your vaccine. You got vaccinated for all the right reasons (protect others, try to end the pandemic, protect your loved ones). Stay metabolically healthy. Metabolic health will protect you going forward. I would not recommend the booster. Multiple doses of these vaccines may have unintended consequences to our immune systems – all doctors agree on this point.
2) We never should have politicized the public health response to COVID-19. This provided a distraction for the potential criminals to execute their plan.
3) Our government system is broken. It failed us in a mild pandemic. If not fixed, it will absolutely fail us in a real pandemic.
4) The lab-leak theory needs to be fully investigated. If we allow it to be ignored – it can happen again.
5) The efforts to suppress early therapeutics was unacceptable. Censoring safe no-lose approaches like getting out in the sun to generate Vitamin D should never be suppressed. The Attorney General’s Office of Nebraska issued a scathing review of the suppression of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and provided evidence supporting their use. This received zero publicity from the mainstream media and government bureaucracy. The ethics of having a small group of people at the top of the NIH in charge of funding and having them be in charge with the government messaging is bastardizing the scientific method and leads to massive groupthink and corruption. Unacceptable.
6) There is no evidence that the current COVID vaccines are warranted or justified for children. Children are not at risk from COVID. There has not been one reported incidence of death from COVID in a healthy young person – worldwide! There are proven risks for children with these vaccines. We have never put children’s lives at risk to protect the elderly – no society would ever ask for this sacrifice from its children! We must protect our children. I did not fully investigate or highlight the damage we have done to our children. Keeping them out of school and requiring them to wear masks for the last two years has done tremendous damage. Requiring young healthy young people to get vaccinated to attend school or play sports is unacceptable. This is damage that should never be allowed to be repeated.
7) Intellectual honesty. The COVID vaccines are not performing as promised. In early 2021, Fauci, Walensky, and Pfizer all claimed that these vaccines would stop infection and stop the spread of COVID. We now know that is not the case. We were not promised vaccines that reduce severity. Yet, after completely different results than what was promised – they push to put these vaccines on the children’s schedule and try to push for vaccine mandates. This is not intellectual honesty.
8) We owe it to our children to investigate and fix this. If the above outline has any validity – we must act to fix this.
9) Once again, I would ask that if any of this resonates, forward it to every key person in your network. If it does not – it will die from an appropriate lack of attention.
EXCLUSIONS
I purposely did not fully discuss the mistreatment of our children with school shutdowns, masks, and scare-theatre. I also did not fully discuss how certain small businesses were closed in favor of the larger big box business. The lockdowns should have never been implemented – they were a mistake. On a side note the Canadian Trucker’s Protest has provided me great hope. Sadly, “Go Fund Me” has stolen the $10 million from the truckers as instructed by the Canadian government. This should never happen in a “Democracy” - this is absolutely unacceptable! I tried to limit this to providing a plausible theory on what happened and what the incentives were that may have driven those decisions. Thank you for your time.
Mistakes:
This is my first published article - feel free to critique and I will update and correct as I go along.
Absolutely brilliant. Objective and reasoned. Great work.
The term conspiracy theory was created by spooks at cia. You are 🎯🎯 here. Keep on truckin